Search for: All records

This work integrates machine learning into an atmospheric parameterization to target uncertain mixing processes while maintaining interpretable, predictive, and well‐established physical equations. We adopt an eddy‐diffusivity mass‐flux (EDMF) parameterization for the unified modeling of various convective and turbulent regimes. To avoid drift and instability that plague offline‐trained machine learning parameterizations that are subsequently coupled with climate models, we frame learning as an inverse problem: Data‐driven models are embedded within the EDMF parameterization and trained online in a one‐dimensional vertical global climate model (GCM) column. Training is performed against output from large‐eddy simulations (LES) forced with GCM‐simulated large‐scale conditions in the Pacific. Rather than optimizing subgrid‐scale tendencies, our framework directly targets climate variables of interest, such as the vertical profiles of entropy and liquid water path. Specifically, we use ensemble Kalman inversion to simultaneously calibrate both the EDMF parameters and the parameters governing data‐driven lateral mixing rates. The calibrated parameterization outperforms existing EDMF schemes, particularly in tropical and subtropical locations of the present climate, and maintains high fidelity in simulating shallow cumulus and stratocumulus regimes under increased sea surface temperatures from AMIP4K experiments. The results showcase the advantage of physically constraining data‐driven models and directly targeting relevant variables through online learning to build robust and stable machine learning parameterizations. 

Abstract Heatwaves are projected to increase in frequency and severity with global warming. Improved warning systems would help reduce the associated loss of lives, wildfires, power disruptions, and reduction in crop yields. In this work, we explore the potential for deep learning systems trained on historical data to forecast extreme heat on short, medium and subseasonal time scales. To this purpose, we train a set of neural weather models (NWMs) with convolutional architectures to forecast surface temperature anomalies globally, 1 to 28 days ahead, at ∼200-km resolution and on the cubed sphere. The NWMs are trained using the ERA5 reanalysis product and a set of candidate loss functions, including the mean-square error and exponential losses targeting extremes. We find that training models to minimize custom losses tailored to emphasize extremes leads to significant skill improvements in the heatwave prediction task, relative to NWMs trained on the mean-square-error loss. This improvement is accomplished with almost no skill reduction in the general temperature prediction task, and it can be efficiently realized through transfer learning, by retraining NWMs with the custom losses for a few epochs. In addition, we find that the use of a symmetric exponential loss reduces the smoothing of NWM forecasts with lead time. Our best NWM is able to outperform persistence in a regressive sense for all lead times and temperature anomaly thresholds considered, and shows positive regressive skill relative to the ECMWF subseasonal-to-seasonal control forecast after 2 weeks. Significance StatementHeatwaves are projected to become stronger and more frequent as a result of global warming. Accurate forecasting of these events would enable the implementation of effective mitigation strategies. Here we analyze the forecast accuracy of artificial intelligence systems trained on historical surface temperature data to predict extreme heat events globally, 1 to 28 days ahead. We find that artificial intelligence systems trained to focus on extreme temperatures are significantly more accurate at predicting heatwaves than systems trained to minimize errors in surface temperatures and remain equally skillful at predicting moderate temperatures. Furthermore, the extreme-focused systems compete with state-of-the-art physics-based forecast systems in the subseasonal range, while incurring a much lower computational cost. 

ver the last 10,000 years, human activities have transformed Earth through farming, forestry, mining, and industry. The complex results of these activities are now observed and quantified as “human impacts” on Earth’s atmosphere, oceans, biosphere, and geochemistry. While myriad studies have explored facets of human impacts on the planet, they are necessarily technical and often highly focused. Thus, finding reliable quantitative information requires a significant investment of time to assess each quantity and associated uncertainty. We present the Human Impacts Database (www.anthroponumbers.org), which houses a diverse array of such quantities. We review a subset of these values and how they help build intuition for understanding the Earth-human system. While collation alone does not tell us how to best ameliorate human impacts, we contend that any future plans should be made in light of a quantitative understanding of the interconnected ways in which humans influence the planet.